Russell vs. Ryle
A philosophical spat, played out in the letters pages of The Times newspaper
As is well-known, Bertrand Russell wasn't too keen on the “ordinary language philosophy” that was popular among Oxford philosophers in the middle of the twentieth century. This meant that when the sociologist Ernest Gellner wrote a book, Words and Things (pub: 1959), that was highly critical of the approach, Russell was only too happy to write its Preface.
At this time, the editor of Mind was Gilbert Ryle, a leading exponent of the Oxford approach, and he refused to allow Words and Things to be reviewed in the journal on the grounds that it was abusive and could not therefore be regarded as a serious contribution to academic debate.
This annoyed Russell, who promptly penned a letter to The Times, which resulted in a philosophical spat that played out in the newspaper's letters pages during November 1959.
I reproduce it below.
